0.03/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 1440 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 180 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 06:39:24 EDT 2024 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.21/0.48 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.21/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0iuZAok8cG/E---3.1_14141.p 0.45/0.58 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.45/0.58 # Preprocessing class: HSMMSLSSLLLNHFA. 0.45/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.45/0.58 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores 0.45/0.58 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 0.45/0.58 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 180s (1) cores 0.45/0.58 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores 0.45/0.58 # post_as_ho1 with pid 14233 completed with status 0 0.45/0.58 # Result found by post_as_ho1 0.45/0.58 # Preprocessing class: HSMMSLSSLLLNHFA. 0.45/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.45/0.58 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores 0.45/0.58 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 0.45/0.58 # No SInE strategy applied 0.45/0.58 # Search class: HGUSM-FFSF31-MHFMMSNN 0.45/0.58 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.45/0.58 # Starting new_ho_10 with 54s (1) cores 0.45/0.58 # new_ho_10 with pid 14238 completed with status 0 0.45/0.58 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.45/0.58 # Preprocessing class: HSMMSLSSLLLNHFA. 0.45/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.45/0.58 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores 0.45/0.58 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 0.45/0.58 # No SInE strategy applied 0.45/0.58 # Search class: HGUSM-FFSF31-MHFMMSNN 0.45/0.58 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.45/0.58 # Starting new_ho_10 with 54s (1) cores 0.45/0.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s 0.45/0.58 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.45/0.58 0.45/0.58 # Proof found! 0.45/0.58 # SZS status Theorem 0.45/0.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_sort1, type, term: $tType). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_sort2, type, subst: $tType). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_22, type, one: term). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_24, type, lam: term > term). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_25, type, sub: term > subst > term). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_26, type, id: subst). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_27, type, sh: subst). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_28, type, push: term > subst > subst). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_29, type, comp: subst > subst > subst). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_33, type, axmap: $o). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_40, type, hoasinduction_lem3v2_f: $o). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_41, type, axvarshift: $o). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_82, type, axclos: $o). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_89, type, hoasinduction_lem3v2a: $o). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_93, type, hoaslam: subst > (subst > term > term) > term). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_103, type, hoasinduction_lem3v2a_lthm: $o). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_106, type, hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime: (subst > term > subst > $o) > (term > $o) > $o). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_142, type, axvarid: $o). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_144, type, esk1_1: term > subst > term > term). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_145, type, epred1_0: subst > term > subst > $o). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_146, type, epred2_0: term > $o). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_147, type, esk2_1: (subst > term > term) > subst). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_148, type, esk3_1: (subst > term > term) > term). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_149, type, esk4_1: (subst > term > term) > subst). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_150, type, esk5_1: (subst > term > term) > term). 0.45/0.58 thf(decl_151, type, esk6_0: term). 0.45/0.58 thf(hoasinduction_lem3v2a, axiom, ((hoasinduction_lem3v2a)<=>![X19:subst > term > subst > $o, X9:term > $o]:((![X12:subst > term > term]:((![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst]:(((sub @ (X12 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)=(X12 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))))=>(![X1:term]:(((X19 @ id @ X1 @ id)=>(X19 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ X1) @ id)))=>(X19 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (^[X3:subst, X1:term]:(X12 @ X3 @ X1))) @ id))))=>((hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime @ X19 @ X9)=>![X1:term]:((![X2:term]:(((X9 @ X2)=>(X9 @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ X2 @ id)))))=>(X9 @ (lam @ X1)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0iuZAok8cG/E---3.1_14141.p', hoasinduction_lem3v2a)). 0.45/0.58 thf(hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime, axiom, ((hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime)=(^[X14:subst > term > subst > $o, X9:term > $o]:(![X10:term]:(((X9 @ X10)<=>(X14 @ id @ X10 @ id)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0iuZAok8cG/E---3.1_14141.p', hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime)). 0.45/0.58 thf(hoasinduction_lem3v2a_lthm, axiom, ((hoasinduction_lem3v2a_lthm)<=>((hoasinduction_lem3v2_f)=>((axvarid)=>((axvarshift)=>((axclos)=>((axmap)=>(hoasinduction_lem3v2a))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0iuZAok8cG/E---3.1_14141.p', hoasinduction_lem3v2a_lthm)). 0.45/0.58 thf(axvarid, axiom, ((axvarid)<=>![X1:term]:(((sub @ X1 @ id)=(X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0iuZAok8cG/E---3.1_14141.p', axvarid)). 0.45/0.58 thf(axclos, axiom, ((axclos)<=>![X1:term, X3:subst, X4:subst]:(((sub @ (sub @ X1 @ X3) @ X4)=(sub @ X1 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0iuZAok8cG/E---3.1_14141.p', axclos)). 0.45/0.58 thf(axmap, axiom, ((axmap)<=>![X1:term, X3:subst, X4:subst]:(((comp @ (push @ X1 @ X3) @ X4)=(push @ (sub @ X1 @ X4) @ (comp @ X3 @ X4))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0iuZAok8cG/E---3.1_14141.p', axmap)). 0.45/0.58 thf(axvarshift, axiom, ((axvarshift)<=>((push @ one @ sh)=(id))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0iuZAok8cG/E---3.1_14141.p', axvarshift)). 0.45/0.58 thf(hoasinduction_lem3v2_f, axiom, ((hoasinduction_lem3v2_f)<=>![X2:term]:(?[X12:subst > term > term]:(![X1:term, X3:subst]:(((X12 @ X3 @ X1)=(sub @ X2 @ (push @ X1 @ X3))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0iuZAok8cG/E---3.1_14141.p', hoasinduction_lem3v2_f)). 0.45/0.58 thf(hoaslam, axiom, ((hoaslam)=(^[X3:subst, X12:subst > term > term]:(lam @ (X12 @ sh @ one)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0iuZAok8cG/E---3.1_14141.p', hoaslam)). 0.45/0.58 thf(thm, conjecture, (hoasinduction_lem3v2a_lthm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0iuZAok8cG/E---3.1_14141.p', thm)). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_10, plain, ((hoasinduction_lem3v2a)<=>![X19:subst > term > subst > $o, X9:term > $o]:((![X12:subst > term > term]:((![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst]:(((sub @ (X12 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)=(X12 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))))=>(![X1:term]:(((X19 @ id @ X1 @ id)=>(X19 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ X1) @ id)))=>(X19 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:subst, Z1:term]:(X12 @ Z0 @ Z1))) @ id))))=>((hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime @ X19 @ X9)=>![X1:term]:((![X2:term]:(((X9 @ X2)=>(X9 @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ X2 @ id)))))=>(X9 @ (lam @ X1)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[hoasinduction_lem3v2a])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_11, plain, ((hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:subst > term > subst > $o, Z1:term > $o]:(![X10:term]:(((Z1 @ X10)<=>(Z0 @ id @ X10 @ id)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[hoasinduction_p_and_p_prime])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_12, plain, ((hoasinduction_lem3v2a)=(![X19:subst > term > subst > $o, X9:term > $o]:((![X12:subst > term > term]:((![X3:subst, X1:term, X4:subst]:(((sub @ (X12 @ X3 @ X1) @ X4)=(X12 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4) @ (sub @ X1 @ X4))))=>(![X1:term]:(((X19 @ id @ X1 @ id)=>(X19 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ X1) @ id)))=>(X19 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:subst, Z1:term]:(X12 @ Z0 @ Z1))) @ id))))=>((![X1887:term]:(((X9 @ X1887)<=>(X19 @ id @ X1887 @ id))))=>![X1:term]:((![X2:term]:(((X9 @ X2)=>(X9 @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ X2 @ id)))))=>(X9 @ (lam @ X1))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_13, axiom, ((hoasinduction_lem3v2a_lthm)=(((![X2118:term]:(?[X2119:subst > term > term]:(![X2120:term, X2121:subst]:(((X2119 @ X2121 @ X2120)=(sub @ X2118 @ (push @ X2120 @ X2121)))))))=>((![X2122:term]:(((sub @ X2122 @ id)=(X2122))))=>((((push @ one @ sh)=(id)))=>((![X2123:term, X2124:subst, X2125:subst]:(((sub @ (sub @ X2123 @ X2124) @ X2125)=(sub @ X2123 @ (comp @ X2124 @ X2125)))))=>((![X2126:term, X2127:subst, X2128:subst]:(((comp @ (push @ X2126 @ X2127) @ X2128)=(push @ (sub @ X2126 @ X2128) @ (comp @ X2127 @ X2128)))))=>(![X2129:subst > term > subst > $o, X2130:term > $o]:((![X2131:subst > term > term]:((![X2132:subst, X2133:term, X2134:subst]:(((sub @ (X2131 @ X2132 @ X2133) @ X2134)=(X2131 @ (comp @ X2132 @ X2134) @ (sub @ X2133 @ X2134))))=>(![X2135:term]:(((X2129 @ id @ X2135 @ id)=>(X2129 @ id @ (X2131 @ id @ X2135) @ id)))=>(X2129 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:subst, Z1:term]:(X2131 @ Z0 @ Z1))) @ id))))=>((![X2136:term]:(((X2130 @ X2136)<=>(X2129 @ id @ X2136 @ id))))=>![X2137:term]:((![X2138:term]:(((X2130 @ X2138)=>(X2130 @ (sub @ X2137 @ (push @ X2138 @ id)))))=>(X2130 @ (lam @ X2137))))))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[hoasinduction_lem3v2a_lthm, axvarid]), axclos]), axmap]), axvarshift]), hoasinduction_lem3v2_f]), c_0_12])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X3398:subst, X3399:subst > term > term]:(((hoaslam @ X3398 @ X3399)=(lam @ (X3399 @ sh @ one)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[hoaslam])])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ~((![X3373:term]:(?[X3374:subst > term > term]:(![X3375:term, X3376:subst]:(((X3374 @ X3376 @ X3375)=(sub @ X3373 @ (push @ X3375 @ X3376))))))=>(![X3377:term]:(((sub @ X3377 @ id)=(X3377)))=>(((push @ one @ sh)=(id))=>(![X3378:term, X3379:subst, X3380:subst]:(((sub @ (sub @ X3378 @ X3379) @ X3380)=(sub @ X3378 @ (comp @ X3379 @ X3380))))=>(![X3381:term, X3382:subst, X3383:subst]:(((comp @ (push @ X3381 @ X3382) @ X3383)=(push @ (sub @ X3381 @ X3383) @ (comp @ X3382 @ X3383))))=>![X3384:subst > term > subst > $o, X3385:term > $o]:((![X3386:subst > term > term]:((![X3387:subst, X3388:term, X3389:subst]:(((sub @ (X3386 @ X3387 @ X3388) @ X3389)=(X3386 @ (comp @ X3387 @ X3389) @ (sub @ X3388 @ X3389))))=>(![X3390:term]:(((X3384 @ id @ X3390 @ id)=>(X3384 @ id @ (X3386 @ id @ X3390) @ id)))=>(X3384 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:subst, Z1:term]:(X3386 @ Z0 @ Z1))) @ id))))=>(![X3391:term]:(((X3385 @ X3391)<=>(X3384 @ id @ X3391 @ id)))=>![X3392:term]:((![X3393:term]:(((X3385 @ X3393)=>(X3385 @ (sub @ X3392 @ (push @ X3393 @ id)))))=>(X3385 @ (lam @ X3392))))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]), c_0_13])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X3404:subst, X3405:subst > term > term]:(((hoaslam @ X3404 @ X3405)=(lam @ (X3405 @ sh @ one)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X3406:term, X3408:term, X3409:subst, X3410:term, X3411:term, X3412:subst, X3413:subst, X3414:term, X3415:subst, X3416:subst, X3419:subst > term > term, X3424:term, X3426:term]:((((esk1_1 @ X3406 @ X3409 @ X3408)=(sub @ X3406 @ (push @ X3408 @ X3409)))&(((sub @ X3410 @ id)=(X3410))&(((push @ one @ sh)=(id))&(((sub @ (sub @ X3411 @ X3412) @ X3413)=(sub @ X3411 @ (comp @ X3412 @ X3413)))&(((comp @ (push @ X3414 @ X3415) @ X3416)=(push @ (sub @ X3414 @ X3416) @ (comp @ X3415 @ X3416)))&((((epred1_0 @ id @ (esk5_1 @ X3419) @ id)|(epred1_0 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ X3419) @ id)|((sub @ (X3419 @ (esk2_1 @ X3419) @ (esk3_1 @ X3419)) @ (esk4_1 @ X3419))!=(X3419 @ (comp @ (esk2_1 @ X3419) @ (esk4_1 @ X3419)) @ (sub @ (esk3_1 @ X3419) @ (esk4_1 @ X3419)))))&(~(epred1_0 @ id @ (X3419 @ id @ (esk5_1 @ X3419)) @ id)|(epred1_0 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ X3419) @ id)|((sub @ (X3419 @ (esk2_1 @ X3419) @ (esk3_1 @ X3419)) @ (esk4_1 @ X3419))!=(X3419 @ (comp @ (esk2_1 @ X3419) @ (esk4_1 @ X3419)) @ (sub @ (esk3_1 @ X3419) @ (esk4_1 @ X3419))))))&(((~(epred2_0 @ X3424)|(epred1_0 @ id @ X3424 @ id))&(~(epred1_0 @ id @ X3424 @ id)|(epred2_0 @ X3424)))&((~(epred2_0 @ X3426)|(epred2_0 @ (sub @ esk6_0 @ (push @ X3426 @ id))))&~(epred2_0 @ (lam @ esk6_0))))))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])])])])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X3:subst, X12:subst > term > term]:(((hoaslam @ X3 @ X12)=(lam @ (X12 @ sh @ one)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X2:term, X3:subst]:(((esk1_1 @ X1 @ X3 @ X2)=(sub @ X1 @ (push @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ((push @ one @ sh)=(id)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(((sub @ X1 @ id)=(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X12:subst > term > term]:(((epred1_0 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ X12) @ id)|~((epred1_0 @ id @ (X12 @ id @ (esk5_1 @ X12)) @ id))|((sub @ (X12 @ (esk2_1 @ X12) @ (esk3_1 @ X12)) @ (esk4_1 @ X12))!=(X12 @ (comp @ (esk2_1 @ X12) @ (esk4_1 @ X12)) @ (sub @ (esk3_1 @ X12) @ (esk4_1 @ X12)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X3:subst, X1:term]:(((hoaslam @ X3 @ (esk1_1 @ X1))=(lam @ X1))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), c_0_20]), c_0_21])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X3:subst, X4:subst]:(((comp @ (push @ X1 @ X3) @ X4)=(push @ (sub @ X1 @ X4) @ (comp @ X3 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term, X3:subst, X4:subst]:(((sub @ (sub @ X1 @ X3) @ X4)=(sub @ X1 @ (comp @ X3 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X12:subst > term > term]:(((epred1_0 @ id @ (esk5_1 @ X12) @ id)|(epred1_0 @ id @ (hoaslam @ id @ X12) @ id)|((sub @ (X12 @ (esk2_1 @ X12) @ (esk3_1 @ X12)) @ (esk4_1 @ X12))!=(X12 @ (comp @ (esk2_1 @ X12) @ (esk4_1 @ X12)) @ (sub @ (esk3_1 @ X12) @ (esk4_1 @ X12)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(((epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ X1) @ id)|~((epred1_0 @ id @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ (esk5_1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1)) @ id)) @ id)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_19]), c_0_23]), c_0_24]), c_0_19]), c_0_25]), c_0_19])])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(((epred1_0 @ id @ X1 @ id)|~((epred2_0 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(((epred2_0 @ X1)|~((epred1_0 @ id @ X1 @ id)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(((epred1_0 @ id @ (esk5_1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1)) @ id)|(epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ X1) @ id))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_19]), c_0_23]), c_0_24]), c_0_19]), c_0_25])])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(((epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ X1) @ id)|~((epred2_0 @ (sub @ X1 @ (push @ (esk5_1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1)) @ id)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(((epred2_0 @ (sub @ esk6_0 @ (push @ X1 @ id)))|~((epred2_0 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ![X1:term]:(((epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ X1) @ id)|(epred2_0 @ (esk5_1 @ (esk1_1 @ X1))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ id @ (lam @ esk6_0) @ id), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_32]), c_0_33])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ~((epred2_0 @ (lam @ esk6_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.45/0.58 thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_34]), c_0_35]), ['proof']). 0.45/0.58 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.45/0.58 # Parsed axioms : 238 0.45/0.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.45/0.58 # Initial clauses : 137 0.45/0.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 124 0.45/0.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13 0.45/0.58 # Processed clauses : 58 0.45/0.58 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.45/0.58 # ...subsumed : 11 0.45/0.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 47 0.45/0.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.45/0.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.45/0.58 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.45/0.58 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.45/0.58 # Generated clauses : 77 0.45/0.58 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 66 0.45/0.58 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.45/0.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1 0.45/0.58 # Paramodulations : 73 0.45/0.58 # Factorizations : 0 0.45/0.58 # NegExts : 0 0.45/0.58 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.45/0.58 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.45/0.58 # Total rewrite steps : 59 0.45/0.58 # ...of those cached : 21 0.45/0.58 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.45/0.58 # Propositional check models : 0 0.45/0.58 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.45/0.58 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.45/0.58 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.45/0.58 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.45/0.58 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.45/0.58 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.45/0.58 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.45/0.58 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.45/0.58 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.45/0.58 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.45/0.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 34 0.45/0.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 17 0.45/0.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4 0.45/0.58 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.45/0.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 12 0.45/0.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 34 0.45/0.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 48 0.45/0.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.45/0.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 13 0.45/0.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19 0.45/0.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18 0.45/0.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1 0.45/0.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15 0.45/0.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.45/0.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 8 0.45/0.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 4 0.45/0.58 # Condensation attempts : 58 0.45/0.58 # Condensation successes : 0 0.45/0.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 28885 0.45/0.58 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2061 0.45/0.58 0.45/0.58 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.45/0.58 # User time : 0.033 s 0.45/0.58 # System time : 0.010 s 0.45/0.58 # Total time : 0.043 s 0.45/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 5804 pages 0.45/0.58 0.45/0.58 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.45/0.58 # User time : 0.041 s 0.45/0.58 # System time : 0.013 s 0.45/0.58 # Total time : 0.054 s 0.45/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2076 pages 0.45/0.58 % E---3.1 exiting 0.45/0.58 % E exiting 0.45/0.58 EOF